Monday, June 20, 2011

10 Warning Signs for Churches

I am A fan of Tom Rainer.  He wrote a book a few years ago that really connected with me called "Breakout Churches" .

Here is a recient article he wrote that I thought was helpful and good to read.
_______________________________________

Prior to my present place of ministry, I spent over 20 years consulting with churches across America. I have also had the wonderful opportunity to research churches primarily in the United States. Over time, I began to notice certain patterns or signs that would indicate a congregation might be headed for trouble.

After reviewing my consultation notes and research, I found ten warning signs for churches. If a church had four or more of these signs present, I would let the leadership know that remedial efforts were in order. If six or more signs were present, I was concerned that the congregation was in immediate trouble.

The List

The warning signs below are not listed in any particular order, nor are they the result of a scientifically accurate study. Though the information is both experiential and anecdotal, I found it immensely helpful in diagnosing the health of a church.

Church leaders should be concerned...
  • If the pastor does not have adequate time to be in the Word or if he chooses not to do so.
  • If the members are spending time arguing about how money should be spent.
  • If none or only a few of the key leaders are actively sharing their faith.
  • If there is no clear process of discipleship in place, just a plethora of programs and activities.
  • If corporate prayer is not a major emphasis in the church.
  • If church members are arguing about worship style or worship times.
  • If church members expect the paid staff to do most of the ministry, instead of the staff equipping the members to do the work of ministry (“Why didn’t he visit me in the hospital?”)
  • If there are ongoing disagreements about matters of the church facilities.
  • If the church has more meetings than new disciples.
  • If the leadership of the church does not have a coherent plan for what is taught in small groups and Sunday school classes.

The Pattern

There is a common pattern for most of the warning signs. Church members are more concerned about their preferences and desires. They are inwardly focused. They ask what the church can do for them, instead of asking how God can use them sacrificially and radically through the ministries of the local church.

True Christianity is a faith that always seeks to put others first. Sadly, in many of the churches across our land, members are more concerned about getting their own personal needs and preferences met.

___________________________________


So??? How is your church doing?  Maybe you should take his list and make it a topic for discussion at your next leadership meeting?

In my opinion... we MUST be having these conversations with our people...

Wednesday, June 15, 2011

FREE STUFF... nice!!

As a solo pastor in a smaller church... I know that finances are often TIGHT... so I have become a pastor on a mission for FREE STUFF that will help my ministry.  One of the reasons why I started this blog was to have a online resource (free of course)  for leaders who, like me, are always looking for GOOD freebees.  A place where if you know of something good, you could send a note and we could post it here!

With this in mind I want to share with you a new web paged called STUFF I CAN USE.
I think it is awesome...

Find it here.

Any other goodies that you know about?  If so click comment below and I will post it.

Thursday, April 21, 2011

Five Subtle Ways Satan Sneaks Into Your Pulpit

VERY GOOD article by
Dr. R. Larry Moyer

Has or is this happening to you?
Comment after you read it...
_______________________________________________

Take five minutes out. Lean back in your chair at the office or put your feet up in your recliner. You might close your eyes to help you think and ponder. Now ask yourself a question that could determine if you'll still have an effective ministry 20 years from now: "If Satan were to sneak into your pulpit, how would he do it?" Keep in mind that you won't recognize him by his clothing or actions. He'll be kind, polite, winsome, and attractive. But he's ugly and deceptive underneath.
Effective ministry demands that we recognize the tactics of the enemy and then guard against them. Penetrating Satan's mind and knowing that "He that is in you is greater than he that is in the world" are key (I John 4:4).
Criss-crossing the world as an evangelist, I've seen five prominent ways he sneaks in the pulpit. Let's examine what they are and how to avoid them.

1. Satan will convince you that you're not only someone, you are SOMETHING.

 God never uses one person or one ministry to touch everyone. It's together that we get the job done. It's the combination of spiritual gifts God uses to build up the body. That's why I Corinthians 12: 21 teaches, "And the eye cannot say to the hand, ‘I have no need of you'; nor again the head to the feet, ‘I have no need of you.'"
You are one of the "someones." Uniquely gifted, God uses you and your giftedness to both reach the lost and build up those who are His. As people are helped and blessed, they        let you know. They should! All of us need to be encouraged.
But one encouraging comment can become several comments, sometimes many comments. They come verbally through text messages and emails. Sometimes comments you make get repeated on a website or two, and then you might find people have referred to you on Twitter or Facebook.
That's when Satan causes you to think you're not only someone, you are SOMETHING. Pride creeps in—not overnight, just one Sunday at a time. In six months, you start to be a different person. You begin to ponder, "Where would the church be without me? Why don't other preachers develop the skills that I have? I never knew God was going to so abundantly use me."
The answer for this problem is two-fold. First, secure an accountability partner who is honest enough to tell you every time they see something prideful about you. But don't get defensive, since they are probably right and are trying to help (as you asked them to), not hurt. Secondly, every day remember something: Should you be wiped off the scene today, the work of Christ would go on pretty much unhindered. This fact is sobering to say the least and keeps you right where you need to be—feeling dependent, undeserving, and grateful.

2. Satan will suggest that instead of teaching something relevant, you need to teach something new.

The preacher's job is well defined. II Timothy 4:2 says, "Preach the word! " This means our message is confined to what He says. We are not teaching something new but truth as old as the Bible itself. We don't have to make it relevant; it is relevant. All we have to do is communicate effectively to the people. This is why the pressure we need to feel is not how to come up with a truth our people have never heard of. Instead, it's the pressure to take the truth God gave years ago and put it in words that are meaningful and applicable. Sometimes we teach the same truth 50 times. It's been accurately stated that effective communication is saying the same thing in different words.
But the longer you're in the ministry, the easier it can be for Satan to convince you that people are tired of hearing the same old thing. Therefore, instead of feeling the need to use sentences, illustrations, and analogies that drive truth home in a fresh way, you think that you need to come up with something new, period—something never thought of, never taught, and never heard. The subject may be the mind, marriage, relationships, spiritual growth, love, hate, or a myriad of things. Soon you have stepped outside the Scriptures, teaching your thoughts instead of His. Discerning people will appropriately begin to say, "I'm not sure that's what the Scriptures say." The difference is profound. God has never promised to bless your word; He's only promised to bless His.
The answer? Get down on your knees, open the Bible in front of you, and utter a simple prayer: "Don't let me stray outside this book, but help me teach whatever is in this book clearly and effectively." Then, approach someone in your church who is very knowledgeable in the Word and say to them, "If you hear me say something strange, don't just accept it. Ask me about it, and don't assume that because I'm the preacher I am right." That person should regard you highly for caring enough to make sure you're preaching His thoughts, not yours.

3. Satan will tell you that your people need an exhorter in evangelism.

A pastor who has spent any time in the Word knows II Timothy 4:5: "But you be watchful in all things, endure afflictions, do the work of an evangelist, fulfill your ministry." When Paul wrote that, he was not addressing Timothy as a gifted evangelist, but Timothy as a gifted pastor-teacher.
Unfortunately, Satan will try to define that verse for you. He can convince you that you have to stand before your people and say, "Evangelize, evangelize, and evangelize." That way, you feel that you have done your part.
It is what Satan doesn't tell you that matters. He doesn't tell you that people are most apt to do what you do, not what you say. If you talk about the lost, they will talk about the lost. If you talk to the lost, they will talk to the lost. Examples, not exhortation, change the hearts of people in evangelism.
As you show your church how you take advantage of opportunities to converse with the lost, soon you will have a church full of people who are not just "discussing" the work of an evangelist but are doing the work of an evangelist. How do you get there? It's simpler than you might think.
First, as Paul did in Ephesians 6:19–20, ask your people to pray that when you open your mouth, something will come out of it (utterance) and boldly. Secondly, once again, find an accountability partner. This may be the one you've asked to check your pride or maybe a different one. But once a month, have that person ask you, "What have you done to reach out this week to a lost person?" I assure you, I know pastors who have taken up that challenge, and it is changing their lives and—guess what—their churches.

4. Satan will convince you that you can grow spiritually through your sermon preparation.

I've heard of few sermons that benefited people much when they didn't first hit the preacher. Preachers who preach with passion are those who have been so deeply touched by a passage that they become a channel to transfer the blessing to others. It shows in the way they come across. Their whole demeanor is not, "This is what you need." Instead, it is, "This is what God showed me I need, and I know you're going to be blessed by it, too." Sometimes there's uncertainty as to whether it's a sermon or a testimonial.

But Satan uses the struggle every preacher faces: time. You can begin to think that you don't have time to get alone with God, so your sermon preparation, climaxed by a few moments of prayer, will suffice.
Since God is a God of grace, He obviously understands your time constraints and loves you, but He also desires your fellowship (I John 1:3). Those moments when you close your ear to everyone else's voice and just listen to His as it comes through devotional study of the Word—those uninterrupted moments with your best friend—are what keeps you fresh. Some of those times cause tears to run down your cheeks as He shows you areas in which you're flawed and need improvement, but you still come away feeling energized. Interestingly enough, preachers who have fallen away from the Lord have commented to me that where they made their mistake was neglecting their quiet time with Him.
Consider creating a hallowed spot. For me, it's my chair in the living room where God and I meet each morning. Always going through a book of the Bible, I may cover one verse or I may cover a chapter. I don't care. What I do care about is that I go from there into my day's activity with one truth to meditate on for that day. I also keep the requests I give Him carefully noted on a 3x5 card, so I'm careful not to forget. I come away fed, energized, helped, and encouraged—as only the One who saved me more than 40 years ago can do. Don't ask me why He would ever want to be with someone so depraved as you or me. But He can't wait to talk, and I can't wait to listen and respond.

5. Satan will convince you that "you're not getting the attention you deserve."

Frustrating, isn't it? You may be more faithful in your study and preparation of your message than many preachers you know, but somehow they get the recognition you don't. What follows is money. Increased recognition brings increased funds with it. So while you and your church struggle to make it, the other preacher's church and even the preacher are doing quite well.
Satan can convince you that you have a right to be frustrated. You are not getting half the attention you deserve. Soon your frustration turns to others whom you deem responsible—your people, a staff member, board member, denominational head, or perhaps your own mate. Tension builds, and Satan stands on the sideline smiling…correction: laughing.
The answer: Go back to the starting block. Don't memorize but master I Corinthians 4:2, "Moreover it is required in stewards that one be found faithful." Note the word is "faithful," not "famous." Place it in front of you on the desk. Hang it in your office. But don't just memorize it; swallow it. Absorb it into your spiritual being so that it becomes a governing principle of your life.
Why? Because God is the keeper of the books. No good deed goes unrewarded. No amount of discipleship goes unnoticed. No mistakes are made in His bookkeeping. Everything due to you will come in terms of recognition, if not now, then later. He promises, "And behold, I am coming quickly, and My reward is with Me, to give to everyone according to his work" (Revelation 22:12). Think about it—who would you rather be rewarded by? Someone down here who only sees a lot of what you do, or someone "up there" who sees all of what you do?

Conclusion

Now that you know Satan's tactics and how to prevent them, ACT! Let Satan know in no uncertain terms that his tactics won't work with you. James 4:7 promises, "Resist the devil and he will flee from you." Your prayers and action will give him a not-so-subtle message: "I'm not interested in a truce; I'm only interested in victory. And victory will be mine."

Wednesday, March 16, 2011

Four Principles for Leading the Change Resistant Church

RE-POSTED from Thom Rainer  web page.  Find it here...
______________________________________________________

The telephone call happened just this past week. But it was representative of dozens of similar calls and emails I receive in the course of a year. The pastor was deeply frustrated. He was considering leaving his church, but was also dealing with the reality that the congregation may push him out as well.
He is a faithful pastor. He is doing all he can to lead his church to become a Great Commission congregation. But many members in the church believe their congregation has changed too much too quickly. They no longer recognize the church they loved.
Looking for Answers, Looking for Hope
The pastor was waiting for me to respond. Even more, he was desperate for some type of hope. He was tired of dissension, tired of criticisms, and tired of hurting. What I shared with him was not a magical formula for fixing the change resistant church. To the contrary, my comments were so basic that he likely felt disappointed.
But I have heard from thousands of pastors in over two decades of research on American churches. And I have served as pastor of four churches myself. The four principles I offered are therefore not theoretical. Nor are they limited to pastors of change resistant churches. In many ways they are principles for leadership in all churches.
Love the People
I remember the first time a mentor told me that I should love everyone in the church where I served as pastor. I told him that I could love most of the members, but there were a handful that was just too mean and too evil to love. He then asked me if they had done anything more harmful to me than I had done to put Jesus on a suffering cross.
His words stunned me. I guess I was stunned because they were so true. If Jesus can love me after I sent Him to the cross, I can love others who hurt me. I may not feel emotions of love for my critics, but I can pray that Christ’s love will work through me.
Focus on the Basics
Another pastor recently told me that his church had resisted almost all the changes he had tried to implement. Instead of continuing the battles, he and a few other members began spending their time praying and sharing the gospel with others more fervently. Now the church is seeing people become followers of Christ every week. And the congregation has grown over 20 percent in less than two years.
“I still would like to see the church make some desperately needed changes to better contextualize in our community,” he told me. “But, I have to admit, God is doing a great work despite the obstacles we face.” The pastor is also spending 15 to 20 hours per week in sermon preparation. “The congregation is definitely responding to my preaching,” he said. “Almost everything we’re doing is just getting back to the basics.”
Stretch the Rubber Band
Every congregation has an “elasticity factor.” When you stretch a rubber band, one of three things happens. Stretch it far and will snap back on you. Stretch it too far and it will break. But if you stretch it slightly, it will become just a little bit longer. The increase in length is almost imperceptible, but nevertheless the rubber band has transformed slightly.
A leader of change resistant church must stretch the church to change. But, many times, the change is almost imperceptible. Still, it can be less painful than the congregation “snapping back” or, even worse, breaking altogether. A wise leader will know the church’s elasticity factor, and lead the church toward incremental change.
Pray and Trust God
The fourth principle is so obvious that I almost did not post it. But we who are leaders need to be reminded again and again that our clever devices of leadership and change are worthless unless we are people of prayer who trust God. Sometimes we become too enamored with our own leadership abilities and the latest methodological approaches. Sometimes we need to relax a bit and let God be our strength and power instead of trying with our own means.
It’s amazing what God can do when we relinquish our will to His. Many of us leaders need to trust less in our own devices and spend more time in prayer listening to and speaking with God. It is, after all, His church that we are leading.

Saturday, March 12, 2011

10 Reasons Why Small Churches Stay Small

Thursday, March 3, 2011

Is Leadership Un-Biblical?

Here is a great re-post of an article by David Fitch (bi-vocational pastor at Life on the Vine and the B.R. Lindner Chair of Evangelical Theology at Northern Seminary.)It can be found here (http://www.churchleaders.com/pastors/pastor-how-to/147575-is-leadership-un-biblical.html)
What do you think?
_______________________________________________________
There’s been much ranting and raving on the Internet about the inadequacies of leadership in the church. I must admit I recoil whenever I hear people say, “Leadership is Biblical.” For a lot of reasons, I find it erroneous to say, “Leadership is Biblical.” When I say “leadership,” I am talking about the way the term has become adopted into the vernacular of evangelical leadership conferences and books. We might need to find a new word when we are talking about what leaders do in a church if we are ever going to truly “lead” a gathering community into the Kingdom. It simply requires a skill quite a bit different than what many in the church have come to describe as “leadership.” Here are five comments on why I believe “Leadership is not Biblical.”
1.)   The word “leader” itself is generally avoided in the New Testament within the context of the church (with the notable exception of Hebrews 13:17,24). Likewise, the NT writers generally avoid using secular or Old Testament (LXX) titles for authoritative office. Instead, the New Testament uses the term diakonia (servant, service) to label people in leadership far more times than any other term. The NT writers, therefore, used a word to describe leadership in the church that contrasted violently to the current secular notions of office. The NT on this reading appears to carefully avoid the models of authority available in surrounding society for defining leadership in the church. All this suggests that using the word “leader” as has been defined by the business culture of North America is highly dubious for the church and, dare I say, “unbiblical.”
2.)   Whenever the word “leader” is used in the New Testament, it is subverted in the church so that “leadership” takes on the element of leading by character not coercion, by submission not hierarchy, and in reverence for the Lordship of Christ. See for example Heb 13:7, “Remember your leaders…consider the outcome of their way of life and imitate their faith.” Wisdom, age, maturity, as well as gentleness and self control, not “lording over” someone are the signs that someone is leading. This pattern, I would argue, is present throughout the whole NT in the way the term “elder” and “overseer” are interchangeable. It reveals that for the early communities, age, wisdom, and maturity were the recognizable traits of “leadership” in the community. Even the way “leader” is supposedly translated in Romans 12:8, it is placed within a total communal relationship of the gifts where each person exerts the authority of his/her gift in submission to the others. I would argue then that LEADERSHIP IS NEVER SOMEHOW A POSITION OF AUTHORITY/SKILL PLACED SOMEHOW UNILATAERALLY ABOVE THE CONGREGATION but always in submission to the body. Once again, the word “leadership” as used in the common parlance of business appears to be unbiblical.
3.)   Jesus Himself subverted the term “leadership.” The NT was so careful with its use of the words for leadership because the NT church carried the consciousness of Christ’s words, “If any one wants to be first, he shall be last of all, and servant of all.” (Mark 9:35) “You know that among the Gentiles those whom they recognize as their rulers lord it over them, and their great ones are tyrants over them. But it is not so among you; but whoever wishes to become great among you must be your servant, and whoever wishes to be first among you must be slave of all. Because the Son of Man did not come to be served but to serve, and to give His life a ransom for many.”(Mark 10:42-45 par Luke 22:25-27) The NT church bears the image of Christ modeling servanthood when He washed His disciples' feet (John 13: 13-17). They remember His words from Matt 23:9-11, “But you are not to be called Rabbi, for you have one teacher and you are all students, And call no one your father on earth, for you have one father, the one in heaven, and do not be called leaders, for One is your leader, the Christ. But the greatest among you shall be your servant; and whoever exalts himself will be humbled, and whoever humbles himself will be exalted.” (NAS) Jesus commands His disciples to refuse any titles of the secular authorities including religious (Rabbi), family (father), or group style leadership (leader). Though we may argue how to implement Jesus' commands on authority and leadership within the church, we must surely conclude that Jesus instructs the church to resist modeling its own leadership in any way on secular notions of leadership existing outside of the church.
4.)   Christian leadership is defined by the posture of submission. To the world, this is not leadership. All of this does not discount the need for leadership, just a different kind of leadership! I believe we need leaders who lead from below, allowing God in Christ through the Spirit to exalt Himself in the midst, leaders who always act out of the authority of his/her gifts as received from Christ (Eph 4:7), who exercise authority as received only in dependence upon Christ. This is the leadership of Christ. We still need this kind of leadership. In fact, we need theological leadership sufficient to guide doctrine and practice in the church (we need ordination which is recognition by the community for this gift). Yet all of these gifted ones “lead” out of submission to God in Christ by the Spirit, always offering what God is giving to the body IN SUBMISSION TO ONE ANOTHER. Dare I say, any other kind of leadership is unbiblical?
5.)   The business models of leadership will handicap us from leading into mission. This is because business style leadership works top down and often works in only already-established authority structures, because business styles of leadership work to passivize the congregation negating participation, and because business styles of leadership work well with people who already are acclimated to church and its Christendom structures of leadership. My general prejudice is that the kind of leadership most often taught in our evangelical churches/institutions is poorly suited to lead our churches into post-Christendom engagement, i.e., into Mission. It’s another reason to be cautious about traditional “leadership” language.
This will raise more questions than it answers. There are thousands of pages to be written on how the submissive (radically subordinate) leader is actually the revolutionary leader. But for now, I’m ready and willing to hear objections and ways this has played out in your own lives.

Friday, February 18, 2011

Death by Ministry by Eugene Cho

An article I found on Churchleaders.com. 
It is worth reading!
 
Several years ago, I spent several hours per week doing research (and meeting with other pastors) about pastoral health and vitality for my denomination.

I chose to spend some time doing that for selfish reasons. I was and am still learning how to take better care of myself in ministry (as evidenced by the scary picture above) – while completely acknowledging that sometimes, it’s not supposed to feel right. We all know that work…well…is supposed to be laborious. And those in ministry know that ministry in itself is difficult. There’s no way to get around it, but…
What I learned was pretty shocking and heartbreaking, but one of the conclusions I came to was that as ministry leaders, pastors, and other pursuers of God’s work, it helps to understand some of the challenges ahead and to be proactive rather than reactive.

Yesterday, I posted Part I of this post entitled, Why Is Being a Pastor So Unhealthy. The reasons are complex, and I’ll acknowledge that when one looks for “doom and gloom,” you’ll find some discouraging things. I can focus an entry purely on the joys and blessings of pastoral ministry and feel confident I can write a compelling piece. But these statistics (and stories that many of us are aware of) and our personal stories are hard to ignore.


Here’s a summary of what I learned and shared:
There are varying reports from different sources, but I believe most will agree that the ministerial profession (life as pastors) is now considered one of the most dangerous or unhealthiest professions. It’s usually rated last or second to last. Read this from a local Northwest minister, Mark, on a comment on an earlier post:
“At the first church I served, we had an insurance agent who was a member of the congregation. When I went to see him about some auto insurance needs, he said 'Hey, wanna see something that will scare the crap out of you?'…He pulled out a form that had various professions rated for their risk of giving life insurance policies to…Anyway, to make a lengthening story shorter, he showed me that clergy members were in the same category as Deep Sea Welders and Loggers as the second highest risk group to give life insurance policies to. We were behind crab fishermen but ahead of munitions workers.
It was a little disturbing to know that statistically I was gonna die due to my profession before someone who builds explosives. This was back in 1994; the statistics may be better (or worse) now.”
If you don’t believe the above comment, read some of these statistics:
Forty-eight percent of them think their work is hazardous to their family’s well being. Another 45.5% will experience burnout or depression that will make them leave their jobs. And 70% say their self-esteem is lower now than when they started their position. They have the 2nd highest divorce rate among professions. Who are they? They are pastors. Here are some more overwhelming statistics from this article.
  • 80% of pastors say they have insufficient time with spouse and that ministry has a negative effect on their family.
  • 40% report a serious conflict with a parishioner once a month.
  • 33% say that being in ministry is an outright hazard to their family.
  • 75% report they’ve had a significant stress-related crisis at least once in their ministry.
  • 58% of pastors indicate that their spouse needs to work either part time or full time to supplement the family income.
  • 56% of pastors’ wives say they have no close friends.
  • Pastors who work fewer than 50 hrs per week are 35% more likely to be terminated.
  • 40% of pastors considered leaving the pastorate in the past three months.
Feeling dizzy? Take a breath. Here are some more statistics:
  • Fifteen hundred pastors leave the ministry each month due to moral failure, spiritual burnout, or contention in their churches.
  • Fifty percent of pastors’ marriages will end in divorce.
  • Eighty percent of pastors and eighty-four percent of their spouses feel unqualified and discouraged in their role as pastors.
  • Fifty percent of pastors are so discouraged that they would leave the ministry if they could, but have no other way of making a living.
  • Eighty percent of seminary and Bible school graduates who enter the ministry will leave the ministry within the first five years.
  • Seventy percent of pastors constantly fight depression.
  • Almost forty percent polled said they have had an extra-marital affair since beginning their ministry.
  • Seventy percent said the only time they spend studying the Word is when they are preparing their sermons. [compiled by Darrin Patrick]
While I love being a pastor and even more, being called to be a pastor, I want folks to know how incredibly difficult it is at times to handle the complexities and stress of being a minister. Finally, at the age of 39, I feel more at peace at how to create boundaries, love my church, better care for my wife and children, support my fellow staff, handle criticism, etc. but there are times, I feel clueless and overwhelmed. I’ve been having occasional visitors from a blog started by and for pastors’ wives [couldn't find one for pastors' husbands]. Some of their comments have been difficult to read because they hit so close to home. I will not post a link to their blog here, but here are two comments:
“Oh, and the financial part is tough. We live on poverty level. I don’t know how we are going to pay all the bills sometimes, much less buy groceries. The Lord always comes through, though, and on a really tough week, someone in the church will anonymously give us a gift. We have no in between at our church. It’s either people trying to help us out (it’s all there what we make each week – in black and white), or it’s people that have this attitude - ‘Pastors are supposed to suffer and sacrifice. It’s part of the job.’ Has anyone else noticed that mentality? I don’t know where it comes from, and it is one of my biggest pet peeves. Pastors aren’t supposed to drive nice cars, have nice houses, or buy new clothes. And we are always supposed to be worried about making ends meet - I wonder if it is just half of my church that thinks that way.”
Here’s the second comment:
“Today my son approached my husband and randomly said, 'I guess you’re going back to church now.' And he wasn’t going anywhere! During seminary, he would walk around the house saying, 'Bye bye, Daddy. Bye bye, daddy!' So sad, but very true. It’s definitely a calling, isn’t it? I told my husband the other day: 'In my classes that I took to prepare me to be a minister’s wife, they told me over and over again, ‘it is the loneliest job in the world,’ but I never realized it until we were in the role…'"
While I feel solid support from my staff, my elder board, and the church as a whole, I know that many of my peers do not feel this way.

Simply, pastors are often underpaid, underappreciated, and at times, undermined.
There is strain on their marriages and families. Two other incredibly real factors that add complexities to the ministerial calling are: 1) the cultural complexity and dynamic of the 21st century and 2) the nebulous but real nature of the spiritual realm and battle. The reality is that being a pastor is not just merely a job nor should it be one. Ministry is a calling. It’s both amazing and incredibly difficult. While it isn’t my desire to overdramatize the significance of ministry, I do believe that the Evil One seeks to impede and harm the work that is to take place through ministers and pastors.
As for the “cultural complexity of the 21st century,” I think this quote captures my sentiment:
“My viewpoint tends to be more organizational, so my take on being a pastor is that it is an impossible job. Here you are asked to be the lead preacher and teacher, available for counseling sessions, leading a staff of people that can span such responsibilities as missions and janitorial, serving as the public face for your organization in the community, networking with other leaders at Christian conferences and denominational gatherings. That’s a lot of hats!…Let’s finally consider the financial issues. I don’t believe pastors are paid very well, so that’s obviously a downer. And if you are paid well, and sometimes even if you aren’t, that has its own issues, for congregants can quite easily feel they own you, since they’re paying your way. What other organization is the person at top in such an awkward financial relationship with his or her co-workers and clients?” [h/t Lee H]

My point is very simple:
Please care, pray, and love your pastors (and church staff) in your churches.
Seriously, give them a nice pay raise, more time off, regular opportunities to get away for even a day retreat to pray, buy them some dinner certificates, honor their spouses, love their children, pray for them, and regularly share your appreciation and affirmation.
Now, I know that this can easily be intended to perpetuate the victim language or mentality, but it’s a two-way street. Churches must seek to honor and care for their pastors and staff and build healthy structures to ensure such care. Similarly, pastors and their families must make choices to be holistically healthy! We must rest, Sabbath, enjoy God, love the Scriptures not simply for the sake of sermon preparations, be in deep friendships and community, exercise, work on our jump shot, continue to be a reader and learner, love and honor our spouses, nurture our children, laugh and have fun, eat healthy and drink good refreshments [use your imagination here], examine and repent of any possible addictions, and [add your contribution here].
We need to lean on God, stop our self-sufficiency, and repent of the idolatry to please all those around us. Easier said than done, but it needs to begin somewhere. Why not now?


Some good news:
Despite the intense nature of pastoral ministry, it is also immensely fulfilling. Huh? It makes total sense to me. According to a recent survey, the top five professions are clergy, physical therapists, firefighters, education administrators, and painters/sculptors:
Clergy ranked by far the most satisfied and the most generally happy of 198 occupations. Eighty-seven percent of clergy said they were “very satisfied” with their work, compared with an average 47 percent for all workers. Sixty-seven percent reported being “very happy,” compared with an average 33 percent for all workers. Jackson Carroll, Williams professor emeritus of religion and society at Duke Divinity School, found similarly high satisfaction when he studied Protestant and Catholic clergy, despite relatively modest salaries and long hours.
“They look at their occupation as a calling,” Carroll said. “A pastor does get called on to enter into some of the deepest moments of a person’s life, celebrating a birth and sitting with people at times of illness or death. There’s a lot of fulfillment.” [read the entire article]

So while pastoral ministry is at times exhausting, draining, depressing, and overwhelming, it’s also meaningful and fulfilling.

May God grant you grace, courage, and strength.
God bless you pastors. God bless your spouses and your children. May you bless your flock and may you be blessed by them. And together, may you bless the Lord as you seek to bless His creation.

Tuesday, February 8, 2011

OPEN LETTER to our District

Sorry for the long absence... 

For my next update I want to talk about something that is going on in our district right now. I am with the PAOC Saskatchewan district if, on the slim chance, someone is reading this blog that I do not personally know... ha! 
    
This week I sent out an email to our a few of our pastors in the district just to get their feedback on some thoughts.  Here is an edited version as the first letter had several constitutional oversights in it. 

I would love your feed back on it...
__________________


Greetings in the name of Jesus,
I would ask you to consider an idea in light of two things that happened last week (Feb 1st).  
The first was,  I read Pastor Dwight’s letter that he will not be letting his name stand for re-election as our District Superintendent.  The second was, I filled out the pre-nomination ballets for the upcoming elections, for the May 2011 District Conference
.     As I looked over the names for those who are eligible to be elected and prayerfully wondered who would take these important positions, especially the critical position of our District Superintendent, (which is the focus of this letter), I had several thoughts. I would like to share them with you, then I want to make several proposals.
1    
  1.  The leadership role of the New District Superintendent (DS) is critical as we face the future of our Saskatchewan district. This person, obviously, needs to be someone with a compassionate, but clear, godly vision on how to face the trials, challenges and the opportunities that awaits for us in this great province.
  2. Our constitutional nomination process, in my opinion, does need a re-look, especially with the election of the DS. As we all receive a pre-conference nomination ballot it is possible that we could have an election from the pre-nomination process.  That means that we could put a leader in place without anyone knowing what their vision or direction is for the district. Also according to our constitution, if there are several people who are nominated from the pre-election ballot and all of them, when called to be notified of this, all decline, we are back to square one. The process then goes to the district conference and it has been my experience that when we get to the district conference, as the names are announced of those who are now again eligible for role of the DS, that many stand up and remove their names from the list!.  This then leaves just a few left, who may, or many not be ready to assume such an important role.  I do not like this possibility. Also, historically, we do not know really anything that happened with the pre-nomination ballot till district conference.  
  3. I feel that since our DS is now elected for four years in their first term I think we should, as a voting body, know what God has placed on their heart, before we vote at the conference.   I do not think the leading of the Holy Spirit in choosing a leader, means that we can not hear and pray over what God is saying to potential future leaders.
           So this is what I would like to propose for voting for the office of District Superintendent:

1) Could those whose names are found on the list of potential candidates, publicly declare quickly if they are unwilling to let their names stand for the position of the DS? That is only if you feel comfortable in doing this.  I feel it would help, even in the re-nomination process, our votes to not be wasted.  There is no rules that are broken by stating that they are NOT interested or don’t feel called to this position at this time.

2) After the pre-nomination process is over and, in the best case scenario, we have THREE or more people (as per our constitution) for the role; could those  be given the opportunity at the District Conference to share their vision and ideas (10 min?) for where they feel the Lord would take this district over the next fours years?  This would give all those who vote, not just those who would know them, an opportunity to make a more informed decision.  I know that when I have brought lay people as a voting delegate from our church family, they (mostly) have NO idea of who they are voting for.  How can they get a sense of the heart and the direction the person is going to go, just by seeing their name on the power point?   This would greatly help with that. I just do not think that giving opportunity to hear from the candidates would remove the Lord’s will being accomplished in the process.

I am sure there are problems with these proposals.  I have a few questions myself on how this would work.  I just want to suggest we try something different as a district in picking this important leadership position. 

I would ask the district executive to consider allowing time at our next conference, to hear from those who would have a vision and heart to take this important position IF we have the required THREE qualified candidates from the pre-nomination ballots.

The Lord is good!
Respectfully submitted,
________________________________________

What do you think?

 

Monday, November 8, 2010

"So how are things going? How many people do you have attending?"

I was having a visit with my mentor and friend Wes and we talked about this article on having a "Church Apgar".  I had read it in the 2nd last edition of LEADERSHIP magazine and I thought this is exactly what we needed to do in our circles as smaller church pastors.   Please have a read and if you think it is a good idea....lets start an "APGAR" revolution!     
__________________________________________

Your Church's Apgar
A new way to measure spiritual vitality
Kevin A Miller | posted 8/02/2010

Your Church's Apgar
ADVERTISEMENT
In his masterful book Better, surgeon Atul Gawande writes that in the 1950s, newborn babies in the United States faced great danger: "One in thirty still died at birth—odds that were scarcely better than they were a century before—and it wasn't clear how that could be changed."
An anesthesiologist named Virginia Apgar was appalled: "Babies who were malformed or too small or just blue and not breathing well were listed as stillborn, placed out of sight, and left to die." Apgar believed these infants could be saved, "but she had no authority to challenge the conventions. She was not an obstetrician, and she was a female in a male world. So she took a less direct but ultimately more powerful approach: she devised a score."
Apgar gave nurses a way to rate the health of babies at delivery: "Ten points meant a child born in perfect condition. Four points or less meant a blue, limp baby."
This simple score, devised by an unlikely person—she had never delivered a baby, as a doctor or even as a mother—"turned an intangible and impressionistic clinical concept—the condition of new babies—into numbers that people could collect and compare."
And doctors, being both compassionate and competitive, wanted to boost Apgar scores for their newborns. So they began giving babies oxygen or warming them. They switched from giving mothers general anesthesia to spinals or epidurals. They began using prenatal ultrasounds and fetal heart monitors. And what a change: instead of one in every thirty babies dying at birth, today it's one in every five hundred. Virginia Apgar's score is saving the lives of over 100,000 American babies every year.
We need an Apgar score for the church.
As pastors, we care deeply about the health and vitality of our congregations. But how can we grasp congregational health? To use Gawande's words, it's "an intangible and impressionistic" concept. We need a measure that's simple, clear, and life-giving.
Problems with the prevailing metric
Through most of the twentieth century, the prevailing statistic for churches was the number of members. But as younger generations no longer formed their identity in relation to institutions—political party, labor union, fraternal organization, church—membership gradually told less about a congregation's real state. A long-established downtown congregation, for example, might have hundreds on the membership rolls but only a handful in worship.
So beginning in the early 1960s, some denominations began to report on worship attendance, and by about 1975, attendance had become the most widely accepted way to measure a congregation's vitality. Go to any pastors' convention and you'll soon be asked, "How big is your church?" or more crudely, "How many are you running?"
Attendance has hung on now, for almost 50 years, with only minor tweaks. In the 1980s, as well-known congregations added Saturday night services, people began counting "weekend worship attendance." In the 1990s, as churches added video venues and multiple sites, the count expanded like a baby boomer's waistline—"weekend attendance in multiple sites and venues." In the 2000s, with the addition of web campuses, it's not considered cheating to add to your count website viewers of online services. But we're still hoping attendance will tell us something essential about the health of our congregation.
Why does attendance hang on?
First, it's simple. An usher with one bad eye can get the number for you.
Second, attendance, unlike membership, means the same thing everywhere.

Third, it's meaningful: Size determines the size of church staff and correlates with annual giving, which is the most influential factor in a senior pastor's compensation.
Finally, size confers social status, speaking engagements, and book contracts. As C. S. Lewis pointed out, medieval people were fascinated by light, but we moderns (and even avowed postmoderns are building on modern rubble) are fascinated by size.
Size even has scriptural support. Proverbs 14:28 states an immutable law of leading human organizations: "A large population is a king's glory, but without subjects a prince is ruined." So don't expect attendance to easily yield its proud place to budget, baptisms, or blog traffic.
And yet. We can't shake the feeling that measuring a local church by weekly attendance is at best insufficient and at worst misleading. What's wrong with it?
The missionally minded question attendance's very premise: It may measure a church's ability to be attractional, but what does it say about its ability to be missional? Many leaders are calling for a radical shift, from counting how many people are in the church service, to counting how many church people are in service. Why not measure the drop in the local community's teen pregnancy rate or the number of wells dug in sub-Saharan Africa?
Isn't there something malodorous in the fact that church attendance clings closely to what Americans value—bigness and money? The radical message of Jesus flips those on their back and honors the tiny (think pearl), the hidden (think yeast), and the willing-to-decay (think grain of wheat).
Even the pastor with a dog-eared copy of The Effective Executive has to admit that attendance focuses on one activity in the Christian life (gathering together, Heb. 10:25) rather than the more-important outcome—conversion or obedience or perseverance or maturity (Matt. 28:20). Peter Drucker pointed out decades ago that "All nonprofits have one essential product: a changed human being." As much as we wish church attendance led inexorably to life change, we know that's not the case.
We need to move beyond measuring churches primarily by attendance. We need a new measure. We need an Apgar score. I'm just crazy enough to propose not just one, but two possibilties.
Virginia Apgar's score measured a baby in five ways. On each, the baby can score either 0 (low), 1 (middle), or 2 (high). To make the five measures easy to remember, some ingenious nurse arranged them so they spell Virginia Apgar's last name:
Appearance (skin color):
0 = blue all over
1 = pink body, but blue extremities
2 = pink all over
Pulse (heart rate):
0 = less than 60
1 = 60 to 100
2 = over 100
Grimace (reflex irritability):
0 = no response to stimulation
1 = grimace or feeble cry when stimulated
2 = sneeze, cough, or pulling away when stimulated
Activity (muscle tone):
0 = none
1 = some flexion (pulling in of limbs)
2 = active movement
Respiration:
0 = absent
1 = weak or irregular
2 = strong

Total the five scores (none of which is size related), and you have a clear indicator of a baby's health: 10 means a baby born in perfect health, though any score from 7 to 10 is generally normal; 4 means a blue baby needing immediate intervention.
What if we created a measure of church vitality that is just as simple? One that is profoundly biblical? One that motivates positive change, independent of size of church or surrounding conditions?
Yes, Virginia, there is a church Apgar score. Actually, here are two.

We might base a "Church Apgar Score" on Acts 2, Luke's proud snapshot of the healthy, bouncing baby church in Jerusalem (see chart above). I reflected on our congregation and gave it an Acts 2 Apgar Score of 6, maybe 7. Other leaders might rate it higher, which is fine with me. The point is not so much the score as the direction, and I think our leaders would agree that in the past few years, we've moved up, praise God.
To view the Acts 2 Church Apgar chart click here. To take this assessment online click here.
If you don't like those categories, another possibility is found in Revelation 2. This Church Apgar offers a different perspective. Here I credit my pastor friend Lee Eclov, who generally lets me pick up the tab for lunch.
He earned several lunches with his brilliant insight, which we publishedonline ("Jesus' Surprising Definition," http://bit.ly/9HpqgF).
He writes: "In the second and third chapters of John's Revelation, in a uniquely direct way, we have the Lord's assessment of health indicators for local congregations."
For a church Apgar, Revelation offers advantages: a larger sample size—seven congregations rather than one—and descriptions of not just church strengths, but also church weaknesses (which sound curiously like our own).
To view the Revelation 2 Church Apgar chart click here. To take this assessment online click here.
On this scale, I gave our church an Apgar score of 8 (but admittedly, we're not facing the kind of persecution, including martyrdom, that the early churches in Asia Minor did).
Whatever weaknesses these church Apgars may have, they have one powerful strength. They can be done quickly and readily. Like those done in delivery rooms.
Other recent church assessments, such as Natural Church Development, Church Health Assessment Tool, Transforming Church Index, and REVEAL's Spiritual Life Survey, are very helpful—if your church has the time, money, and motivation to hire a consultant and/or get people to take surveys.
Many pastors, though, need a measure that is free and simple, more complete than weekly attendance but just as easy to determine. When I assessed our congregation using these Apgars, within a minute or two I knew where to thank God and where to pray for his help and go to work.
What to do with your church's Apgar
Start by prayerfully assessing your church. Don't let your score lead you into discouragement, that occupational hazard of ministry.As my friend Dave says, "A marker of spiritual maturity is being able to use metrics without feeling undue anxiety about them." Instead, gather a small group of leaders—a church board or staff team—to discuss questions like these:
1. What Apgar score did you give our church, and why?
2. For which of these five areas should we stop right now and thank God?
3. Which of these five areas do we sense God leading us to develop first? How does our answer align with our overall sense of calling?
4. What could we do, starting now, that could boost that area by one point in the next year or two?
Each church's response will vary, though I don't see how concerted prayer could not be included.
Focusing on church attendance (alone) turns us into marketers; focusing on an Apgar score turns us into intercessors. And suddenly the "size equals value" noise begins to fade away, because raising your Apgar score one point is no easier for a megachurch than for a house church. It might be harder.
I have a dream. My dream is to go to a pastors' conference and not hear anyone say, "How many are you running?" or "How big's your church?" Instead, I overhear someone say, "How's your Apgar?" and the other pastor replies, "Oh, a 6. I'd like it to be a 7, but we've moved up from a 5 in the past two years, so I'm feeling good about that."
Call me an idealist, but the way we measure church has changed before, and it can change again.

Kevin A. Miller is assistant pastor at Church of the Resurrection in Wheaton, Illinois, and publisher of Leadership.
__________________________________________________________

TAKE AN ONLINE ASSESSMENT TODAY HERE

Wednesday, October 6, 2010

The Solo Church Pastor and Technology

A few weeks ago I watched a Webinar (an online based seminar) on "The Transformational Small Church" by the good folks at LifeWay research.

It really was GREAT!

My friends, we are in some of the GREATEST days to be in ministry in the smaller church. Today, there is really NO reason for the solo pastor to be feel unconnected, lonely and uniformed on what God is saying to His church. With programs like Skype and instant messaging, staying connected it easier and cheaper than ever!

You know what I would like? I would like to see a monthly (bi-monthly?) web based video connection time together for instruction so we can get together, without leaving our areas of ministry so we can encourage, pray together, help each other in vision and mission, equip each other with ideas and news of what is working and what does not work in your solo, smaller church context.

My problem, I do not know how to do this. There are some web sites I have looked at like http://www.gotomeeting.com/fec/webinar and http://www.ustream.tv/

Do you have any thoughts? maybe between us all, we can learn how to do this and have a "solo pastor connection hour" once and a while.

HELP?

-K